D. Abrahamian's Speech at the United Remembrance Day in Toronto

The overriding goals of almost all Armenian organizations, whether humanitarian, benevolent, professional, cultural or political are the same and can be summed up in the following three points:

1. Support Armenia and Artsakh morally, politically and financially
2. Support the infrastructure for the preservation of our heritage and existence in the Diaspora for as long as we can
3. Support Recognition of  G and "expand the scope" of the Armenian Cause

Differences?

Hunchaks and Tashnaks have socialist platforms, though the Tashnaks have hardly put their principles into practice specially in the Diaspora, and throughout most of its history their leaders have reneged on that platform by supporting organisations, governments and agencies of those who fought against socialism. Ramgavars have a "bourgeois" outlook in socio-economic  matters and they have always been consistent whether in Armenia or the Diaspora, but always supportive of Armenia irrespective of its ideology or regime.

However,

Matters of socio-economic class issues have hardly been at stake in the Diaspora, except here and there and only in very limited supportive way in some countries - France, Lebanon-Syria, Iran, etc. Even then the overriding goals enumerated above have been the glue binding them all on an unconscious level, despite their infightings, which accentuated after 1956 and during the Cold War Era.

The Cold war has gone, the Berlin wall is demolished, but two walls remain : Turkey - Armenia, and Tashnak - Nontashnak.
Hopefully following the opening of borders between Armenia and Turkey there will be time to contemplate to eventually demolish, by hook or by crook,  the last remaining vestige of the cold war: The Tashnak - Non Tashnak Divide.

To my understanding the non-Tashnaks have always been willing, but that goodwill has been interpreted by the opposing party as a sign of weakness, or probably some in that organization thinking that such a step would be the demise of Tashnak perceived hegemony.

So be it, what's wrong with that if the main overriding goals will benefit from it. Are organizational interests more important than national goals?